New to the forum.
New to the forum.
Hi all,
I'm newly registered, however the website and forum have always been a great source of info. I've been toying with the idea of getting a CRM for years now. I've finally made the decision to buy one and so I thought it would be a good time to register and to be part of the forum.
I have always had a soft spot for the 2 stroke engine and have had 2T bikes on the road since I was 16. My last bike was a CR 500 AF SM which I loved but certainly wasn't an everyday bike! Since then I've wanted something a lot more useable and I can't think of another bike more suitable than a CRM. I've decide that I'd like a MK3, however I haven't decided whether it should be a standard MK3 or an AR. Engine-wise, what are the pro's and con's of both? I'm leaning towards a late MK3 for simplicity as I assume the electrics on an AR are a little more complex and therfor a potentially larger source of issues? Any input would be greatly appreciated.
Many thanks in advance,
Tom.
I'm newly registered, however the website and forum have always been a great source of info. I've been toying with the idea of getting a CRM for years now. I've finally made the decision to buy one and so I thought it would be a good time to register and to be part of the forum.
I have always had a soft spot for the 2 stroke engine and have had 2T bikes on the road since I was 16. My last bike was a CR 500 AF SM which I loved but certainly wasn't an everyday bike! Since then I've wanted something a lot more useable and I can't think of another bike more suitable than a CRM. I've decide that I'd like a MK3, however I haven't decided whether it should be a standard MK3 or an AR. Engine-wise, what are the pro's and con's of both? I'm leaning towards a late MK3 for simplicity as I assume the electrics on an AR are a little more complex and therfor a potentially larger source of issues? Any input would be greatly appreciated.
Many thanks in advance,
Tom.
-
- NWAA Supporter
- Reactions:
- Posts: 615
- Joined: 03 Jan 2014, 20:37
Re: New to the forum.
The AR is a love hate thing.
I buy bikes on condition and service history personally you could get a money pit Mk3 or AR
I buy bikes on condition and service history personally you could get a money pit Mk3 or AR
Re: New to the forum.
I totally agree with buying on condition and history. With that in mind, what benefit does the AR have over a MK3 and vice versa?
- knackeredMk1
- Super Moderator
- Reactions:
- Posts: 4184
- Joined: 03 Nov 2006, 17:41
- Bike Owned: Modified Mk1
Re: New to the forum.
They are basically the same apart from the engine. The AR has an advanced 2 stroke engine that in original condition makes less pollution than a conventional 2 stroke. Complicated to keep running perfectly, fragile electronics and expensive to repair.
-
- NWAA Supporter
- Reactions:
- Posts: 615
- Joined: 03 Jan 2014, 20:37
Re: New to the forum.
Agreed and I own an AR.
If you like getting stuck in, problem solving and finding rocking horse poo go for the AR if not go for a Mk3.
If you like getting stuck in, problem solving and finding rocking horse poo go for the AR if not go for a Mk3.
Re: New to the forum.
That confirms my thoughts about the AR then! Great idea when new but like any other emission control technology, can become problematic as the engine ages and wears.
On paper, power and torque are the same but are there any genuine performance differences between the two like people suggest?
On paper, power and torque are the same but are there any genuine performance differences between the two like people suggest?
-
- Site Supporter
- Reactions:
- Posts: 307
- Joined: 18 Oct 2007, 18:49
- Bike Owned: MK2
- Location: West Yorks
- Contact:
Re: New to the forum.
My riding buddy has a MK3 I have an AR, both have had meticulous 100% 'nut and bolt' refurbs. There is little or no difference in performance on the road or on the trail that we can see, we are both experienced off road riders and there's no noticeable difference in performance. The only significant difference that we have found is two stroke oil, my AR uses less than half of the MK3, and the AR is a little bit more economical on petrol, but not by much.
Obviously an AR will be newer than any MK3 you can find, but as already stated buy on condition and use - 'you pays your money and you takes your chance'
Those are my thoughts any way.
Richard
Obviously an AR will be newer than any MK3 you can find, but as already stated buy on condition and use - 'you pays your money and you takes your chance'
Those are my thoughts any way.
Richard
-
- NWAA Supporter
- Reactions:
- Posts: 615
- Joined: 03 Jan 2014, 20:37
Re: New to the forum.
Yes my AR uses very little 2T oil and is good on fuel (10 miles per ltr).
-
- NWAA Supporter
- Reactions:
- Posts: 3520
- Joined: 02 Dec 2007, 16:02
- Bike Owned: MK3
- Location: Mid Surrey
Re: New to the forum.
Almost correct, but for the small grammatical error, it should have read, {----- running, perfectly fragile electronics-----} .knackeredMk1 wrote:They are basically the same apart from the engine. The AR has an advanced 2 stroke engine that in original condition makes less pollution than a conventional 2 stroke. Complicated to keep running perfectly, fragile electronics and expensive to repair.
Mike
VFORCE REEDS-MUGEN HEAD AND BARREL-WHITE POWER-ALL ON MY WISH LIST!!