Mugen CDI Vs Standard CDI *Dyno Charts*

Post by **scrubs** » 19 Aug 2007, 20:53

Came across these and thought some of you would find them intresting..

2nd Gear
http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b76/l ... /ecu-1.gif

4th Gear (the dip at the start on the standard was a dyno error)
http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b76/l ... /ecu-2.gif

2nd - 6th
http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b76/l ... /ecu-3.gif

burnout1 · Post by **burnout1** » 20 Aug 2007, 01:38

If I print this out and stik it on my ride , will it go any faster?

Cookie · Post by **Cookie** » 20 Aug 2007, 01:47

thats wishful thinking would be nice though

slider · Post by **slider** » 20 Aug 2007, 07:06

not worth buying a mugen cdi then,seem s like rather a waste of money

purple rooster · Post by **purple rooster** » 22 Aug 2007, 18:54

hmmm £400 worth?

ecoboy · Post by **ecoboy** » 22 Aug 2007, 19:53

yep looks like waste of money indeed and probably runs the standard ride as well

Post by **scrubs** » 22 Aug 2007, 20:33

yeah you lose a lot of low end traction with the mugen.
However I was reading this article a while ago and there was a japanese
guy who had hooked up the two units and had a handle bar mounted
cross over switch for high power and traction mode, that would be pretty
nifty if they wasent so expensive considering they only cost around £150
or something when they were in production I would have paid that.

slider · Post by **slider** » 23 Aug 2007, 08:53

just seems a bit pointless to go to those extremes for a 2% increase and a major loss of bottom end power.i bet you'd probably get the same if not more of a power gain of the cdi just by fitting an aftermarket pipe.just goes to show 'dont believe the hype', i wonder if most people would still pay through the nose for one nowadays if they saw and understood that graph???
cheers scrubs you've saved me some dollar(presuming they made em for a mk2??)

Mugen CDI Vs Standard CDI Dyno Charts

Mugen CDI Vs Standard CDI Dyno Charts