Page 1 of 1

Mugen CDI Vs Standard CDI *Dyno Charts*

Posted: 19 Aug 2007, 20:53
by scrubs
Came across these and thought some of you would find them intresting..

2nd Gear
http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b76/l ... /ecu-1.gif

4th Gear (the dip at the start on the standard was a dyno error)
http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b76/l ... /ecu-2.gif

2nd - 6th
http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b76/l ... /ecu-3.gif

Posted: 20 Aug 2007, 01:38
by burnout1
If I print this out and stik it on my ride , will it go any faster? :?

Posted: 20 Aug 2007, 01:47
by Cookie
thats wishful thinking would be nice though

Posted: 20 Aug 2007, 07:06
by slider
not worth buying a mugen cdi then,seem s like rather a waste of money

Posted: 22 Aug 2007, 18:54
by purple rooster
hmmm £400 worth?

Posted: 22 Aug 2007, 19:53
by ecoboy
yep looks like waste of money indeed and probably runs the standard ride as well

Posted: 22 Aug 2007, 20:33
by scrubs
yeah you lose a lot of low end traction with the mugen.
However I was reading this article a while ago and there was a japanese
guy who had hooked up the two units and had a handle bar mounted
cross over switch for high power and traction mode, that would be pretty
nifty if they wasent so expensive considering they only cost around £150
or something when they were in production I would have paid that.

Posted: 23 Aug 2007, 08:53
by slider
just seems a bit pointless to go to those extremes for a 2% increase and a major loss of bottom end power.i bet you'd probably get the same if not more of a power gain of the cdi just by fitting an aftermarket pipe.just goes to show 'dont believe the hype', i wonder if most people would still pay through the nose for one nowadays if they saw and understood that graph???
cheers scrubs you've saved me some dollar(presuming they made em for a mk2??)